How to Tackle the Top 3 Challenges in Business Payments

Electronic payments and digital systems further complicate an already complex operation.

I Stock 1316693862

Working with multiple systems, the growing threat of fraud, and the lack of visibility into data are the top three challenges treasury professionals face with business payments. That’s according to the Strategic Treasurer 2022 Global Payments Survey of over 230 treasury and payments professionals.

These challenges are not surprising. Adding more electronic payment types and digital systems creates more workflows and disparate sources of data in an already complex operation. At the same time, the rise in ACH payments has unleashed a new wave of sophisticated business email-compromise schemes.

What’s perhaps surprising is that these concerns rose to the level of “top challenge” for companies far more frequently than concerns such as maximizing card rebates and vendor discounts, and utilizing different payment types to optimize working capital.

These are still important, but not nearly as important as making sure the day-to-day process of managing payments works smoothly. These findings of the study square with the top challenges we see working with treasury and payments professionals.

Challenge 1: Using Multiple Systems

The top challenge, cited by 58% of respondents, is that they’re working with multiple systems. That is difficult when systems are not fully integrated, and just 5% of respondents said their ERP system was fully integrated with their banking platforms. Nearly 90% said there was some integration, while 21% said their ERP system is not connected to their banking platforms at all.

What we see is that having systems that are not fully integrated means teams find themselves having to run overlapping processes. They’re toggling between systems and exporting data from one system to a spreadsheet and manually uploading it to a different system.

 Corpay Graphic

At the same time, they’re managing a different workflow for each payment type or program. More than 80% of respondents are originating payments with more than one bank. More than 75% use bank portals for payment connectivity, and 48% cite banks’ complex formatting requirements as a challenge.

Challenge 2: Security and Fraud Management

Preventing fraud is more of a challenge for smaller firms, with 55% citing it as a top concern compared to 36% of those at large firms.

What we’re seeing is that smaller companies are experiencing more of these email-based attacks, probably because their systems and processes simply can’t keep up with fraudsters’ pace of innovation. The fear of an attack is greater because the impact to a smaller company is much bigger and most can’t afford to lose access to their money for long.

Challenge 3: Accessing Real-time Data

Getting real-time visibility into payments data seems to have risen in importance, with 43% of respondents saying it is a top challenge. This is perhaps a sign of changed expectations in a world that is becoming increasingly digitized. It wasn’t that long ago that most vendor payments were made by paper check. In that world, real-time visibility was just a pipe dream.

But the challenge isn’t confined to slower reporting. Reconciliation takes longer, which means that job costing takes longer. In industries like construction, where costs are passed through to the customer, that means that billing is delayed. That, in turn, creates challenges with cash management.

What’s interesting is the extent to which the top three challenges are interrelated. It’s hard to deliver timely, accurate data when you’re working with multiple systems and there’s no standardization. The level of complexity that people are managing creates constant time pressure, giving fraudsters an opening to slip in. Furthermore, delayed data can prevent daily reconciliation, which is one of the best practices for catching fraudulent transactions.

The linkage between these challenges suggests that the same solution can eliminate many of them. Companies seem to be moving in that direction. The top investment areas are AP automation, which could include invoice and/or payment automation, and payment services.

Payment automation allows customers to wrap up disparate payment processes and bank connections into a single workflow. AP only needs to transmit one file to the payment provider, and they receive back standardized remittance data. Using APIs, file transmission can be initiated from the ERP system and the remittance data drops right back in.

Outsourcing payment services is a more robust solution, encompassing automation, vendor enablement, and data management within a B2B payment network. Payment service providers also handle time-consuming back-end issues such as error resolution and escheatment. What we typically see with customers who go the outsourcing route is a 75-80% reduction in time spent on payment processing.

There’s a talk track in the profession about turning accounts payable from cost to profit center through increased credit card rebates. The promise of high rebates on spending you’re already doing is attractive. But if your processes are still largely manual and you’re having to hire extra staff to run the process, that can easily cancel out the gain. And it doesn’t position your organization to scale.

The responses to this survey make it clear that the first order of business is to make sure the process actually works in a scalable, reliable manner with the required protection and visibility. Solutions that address vendor payments holistically and simultaneously streamline complex processes, reduce fraud risk, and give you visibility into the status of all your payments. That, in turn, greatly improves your ability to manage working capital, capture discounts, and make more payments via credit card, thereby increasing rebates and helping you meet your cost cutting goals. 

Sven Hinrichsen is the senior vice president of strategy for Corpay Payables, which enables businesses to spend less through smarter payment methods.

More in Technology & Software