Recent Posts
- It pays to listen to your employees
- Construction spending drops again
- Manufacturing continues to drop
- Tidbits from NAHAD meeting
- Growth in Canadian housing market
- Strong market forecast for welding equipment
- Housing starts hit 17-year-low
- Purchasing talks about MRO buying
- Grainger sales climb
- A hand for the truck?
Recent Comments
- Lissa on A lesson in customer service
- Diamond Davo Supremo on Grainger expands in Pittsburgh
- David on Stimulus tax bill and small business
- Jack Keough on Non-commissioned sales force: good or bad idea
- rob on Non-commissioned sales force: good or bad idea
Most Commented On
- A lesson in customer service (8)
- After 80 years of cooking, she’s burned out (4)
- Can you hear me now? (4)
- Skilled labor shortage is still major concern (4)
- Myths about China and U.S. manufacturing (3)
Archives
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- March 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- January 2006
- September 2005
- August 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
Blog
Non-commissioned sales force: good or bad idea
February 11, 2008
Several months ago we featured an article on a distributorship in the Northeast that had eliminated commissions for its sales force. It’s worked well for this company and has led to the sales force-both inside and outside-to work more closely. And we heard from other distributors who were interested in the concept. An article in the Boston Globe also touched on the subject of a non-commissioned sales force. The article talked about a hi-tech company that had eliminated sales commissions. Describing why his company had gone in that direction, Mitch Little, vice president of the semiconductor company, Microchip, said: “The normal sales call has the customer mind-set of ‘tell me about your product, give me your lowest price and go away.’ We break down that wall. Once the customers understand that we really are there to serve, they start asking for our advice and expertise. We become part of the planning process-what are we working on five years out.”
To read the entire article, click here.
Posted by Jack Keough on February 11, 2008 | Comments (2)
In response to: Non-commissioned sales force: good or bad idea
rob commented:
We are a distributor of industrial electrical controls with sales around $5M and we have NO outside salespeople on commission. Our salespeople are on a bonus plan tied to company performance- the same as every other employee in the business. Our profit margins are significantly higher than our peers and, in 2007, the average employee in our company received bonuses equal to about 24% of their gross pay. Commission-based pay structures take too much time to track, are always subject to argument and don't specifically reward performance. Salespeople end up spending more time trying to make sure they get credit for an account than they do actually selling to the account. I think many companies move to commissions-based pay plans as a way of getting out of actually managing their salesforce. People don't manage themselves, no matter how you pay them. So, manage your people, pay them a salary and they will be more comfortable in their job and work as a team player.
In response to: Non-commissioned sales force: good or bad idea
Jack Keough commented:
Rob: Are those payments based on an annual basis or quarterly, for example? I assume annually. Is is based totally on profit and/or margins? And lasty, what is the reaction of your new hires when you inform them of your comp plan? It certainly seems to be working for you Jack