Recent Posts
- Conference Board downgrades economic forecast
- Job losses worst in five years
- Manufacturing drops to seven-year low
- Ferguson shines despite Wolseley’s woes
- Wolseley shares rise on Stock Building Supply report; profits fall
- Housing construction hits 17-year low
- Boeing strike is already impacting suppliers
- Motion is on the move
- Construction spending drops again
- Distributors and the Internet
Recent Comments
- concerned in Columbia on Wolseley’s stock continues to get hammered
- concerned in columbia on Wolseley’s stock continues to get hammered
- scott miller on Copper theft continues to soar
- Frank Schneider on A lesson in customer service
- Bill Howe on The best and the worst "business friendly" states
Most Commented On
- A lesson in customer service (9)
- Skilled labor shortage is still major concern (6)
- Bailey’s proposal gets unanimous agreement (5)
- After 80 years of cooking, she’s burned out (4)
- Can you hear me now? (4)
Archives
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- March 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- January 2006
- September 2005
- August 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
Blog
The value of independent distributors
October 17, 2006
Affiliated Distributors celebrates its 25th anniversary this year, and at a recent meeting of its North American Industrial Division, CEO Bill Weisberg reviewed the group’s start, its growth and plans for the future. But later in his keynote address, Weisberg came out swinging against national chains, explaining how the independent distributor has really seen the growth in sales over the past quarter century.
In his talk, Weisberg noted that when A-D was formed members were unsure if they could successfully compete with the national chains and survive the consolidation that was rampant. That turned out to be a needless concern as independents actually grew business against those chains.
“In fact, every time the national chains buy someone, our members in that market get stronger and realize accelerated growth,” he said “They pick up new customers that miss the flexibility and service levels that the acquired company no longer provides. They hire quality people that quickly become disillusioned about the new owners and the bureaucracy with which they operate. And they soak up market share like a sponge.”
Weisberg went on to say there are still people today who predict the imminent demise of the independents and the dominance of chains. “These are people who look at the volume of mergers and acquisitions taking place but don’t notice the volume of business that leaks out after every deal. These are people who buy into the spin that executives at these chains use to promote their value in the financial markets while ignoring their company’s performance in customer markets,” Weisberg said.
Weisberg said the future will see an industry increasingly divided. On one hand, he said, will stand a few giant distributors run from corporate headquarters by financial managers with little regard for their company’s people or their relationships with their long-time suppliers—and with little understanding of each local market. Their priority, he said, is the financial marketplace.
“On the other hand stand an army of strong independents. Some are family owned, some are employee owned. Both are professionally managed by people who have a deep commitment to their employees, their long-time suppliers and their local communities. And their priority is the customer,” Weisberg said.
Independents, he added, will be the ones gaining share in local markets, attracting new customers every day, and hiring more and more of the best people.
“Whether you are a distributor or whether you are a supplier, where you choose to stand will determine the success of your company,” he said.
What’s your opinion of Weisberg’s comments? Will the independent distributor continue to grow and take market share from the national chains? Will consolidation result in a handful of giant distributors, with independents fighting for a smaller piece of the sales pie?
Whatever your thoughts, Bill Weisberg raises a number of interesting points and challenges as to the role of the independent distributor. To see the complete text of his remarks click here.
Posted by Jack Keough on October 17, 2006 | Comments (2)
In response to: The value of independent distributors
TRU Group Inc commented:
My focus for this discussion is distribution strategy for expanding sales and in particular the criteria at play in deciding whether to go for Direct Sales or Distributed Sales. I will talk about how to decide whether to use inhouse direct sales, distributor partnerships, or a combination of direct sales and outside distributors, wholesalers or agents. What are the main factors or criteria you should consider and the conditions that should exist to sway you in one direction or the other? We will see that it is not necessarily an easy decision. Go to trugroup.com for details
In response to: The value of independent distributors
PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES commented:
I agree with bill death of the independent distributor has been over exagerated. Although it will become more difficult for the local distributor to compete in the larger accounts (national accounts). What set's us apart is the service and expertise to solve problem's for our customer's


