Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Zibb
Subscribe to Industrial Distribution
Outside Inside Thinking   


Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (6)


Outside Inside Thinking – Blog 1
December 11, 2006

Outside the box thinking is so 1990. Outside the company thinking is very much what we need to work on today. No successful company is an island. We will explore what it takes to think about your trading partners when making process and system decisions.

But, OUTSIDE is not the whole story. What ever we do must relate to our insides. We can never lose sight of the goals and requirements of our organizations. Every successful outside thought or plan must consider and relate to the inside needs.

Over the next year, I will provide input and thoughts on what successful business need to consider in making plans. I do not have the answers, only the questions. Hopefully, we will establish a community and create a dialog that will help each of us find our unique answers.

My input will come from many different places. Part will come from what I hear in the industry. I attend many conferences every year and stay in touch with hundreds of distributors. Some ideas will come from academia. As a non traditional student (that is the politically correct say to say “older”), I am learning much from generation X and Y students as well as from my research into the world of distribution. And, as the founder of an industry round table of software vendor executives, we will peak into what is being developed by distribution centric software vendors.

Your input is always welcome. Do you have a question, a thought you want a comment on, or even an argument for a different point of view? They will all be used to keep the conversation interesting and current.

Let me start by asking for your input on a question that has bothered me for a long time. Since most business leaders know that automation of intra-company transactions will save time, reduce errors, and improve transparency (the ability to better track orders and inventory), why is there so little adoption by companies in Industrial Distribution?

Are we more risk adverse? Do we fear automation? Does the potential complexity or cost scare us off? Why don’t you send all of your trading partners electronic invoices? Why don’t you demand that all of your trading partners send invoices to you electronically? I really want to know.

I look forward to an interesting dialog.

Posted by Steve Epner on December 11, 2006 | Comments (6)


December 14, 2006
In response to: Outside Inside Thinking – Blog 1
Terry Rainwater commented:

I retired after 40 years in industrial distribution and know a thing or two about success. I'm seriously over simplifying, but great people are the key to success. Keep employee morale high, listen a lot, and get rid of employees, especially executives who act and talk like they are better than everyone else, even if they are. Do what you say you will do, or more, but absolutely no less. Establish fair but challenging employee performance measurables and recognize the best preformers lavishly and reward them well. With the top people working for you, let them do their thing and give plenty of room for them to maneuver and make some mistakes. Don't hire your friends and relatives. Don't re-hire anyone who quit you for "any" reason. Give your people the best equipment to work with and the best products available. You get what you pay for. Fire customers who abuse you and your company and/or who refuse to pay you according to the agreed upon terms. Legal boycots of these players would be a good start. Train, train, train, and don't forget to test for what was learned. Let the "old-timers" mentor the newbies with some structure. Be critical in private. Don't believe you are right all the time. Have confidence that you are right most of the time. Smile. Take off your tie. Throw away your cell phone. Answer your own phone. Make your own calls. Say Thank You a lot.




December 21, 2006
In response to: Outside Inside Thinking – Blog 1
Steve Epner commented:

Terry is right on. There are enough thoughts here to form the basis of many comments – and I will shamelessly build on what he has started. Thanks so much for your insights. We all need to step back and recognize the lessons we have learned. More importantly, we need to pass them on. As I like to say: “we learn from our mistakes, I only wish I didn’t learn so much so often.”




January 12, 2007
In response to: Outside Inside Thinking – Blog 1
Tonja Broadwell commented:

I work for a 102-year old family-owned industrial wholesale company based out of the midwest (Nebraska, Iowa, Colorado). The company is full of tradition and employees who have been here for most of their lives. We don't shy away from technology and how it may help us continue to grow and succeed. However, there is a constant struggle between those who welcome the technology and those who think we are moving too far away from our traditional mode of operation. I would assume this is a natural struggle, but do you (or Terry) have any advice on how to better balance the two extremes?




January 14, 2007
In response to: Outside Inside Thinking – Blog 1
Terry Rainwater commented:

Tonja, I wonder, are the company principals happy with where you are and the rate of growth, profitability, etc? Change is good, but to change too quickly or just for the sake of change could be disastrous. I would wager to guess that your customers do business with you because of the way you are and the way they are treated. A sudden change in the "look" and "feel" of your company could cause your customers to see you as "just one of the other guys" instead of the distinct look you have today. Taking advantage of technology that makes employees tasks go more smoothly and provides data that leads to improved efficiency without bogging down the day to day tried and proven techniques is the way to go. Involve all employees by getting their input in the selection and technology choices and upgrades and cherish the traditalists for their input so any changes benefit all employees, management, and customers. There will always be some who see the new ways as the devils ways, and I bet they are good people who can still contribute with their own strengths. Match those to what they do best but don''t let them keep the train from leaving the station.




January 15, 2007
In response to: Outside Inside Thinking – Blog 1
Tonja Broadwell commented:

Now that you mention it, the technology pursuits our company has made over the last few years have been more related to broadening our geographic reach and our product offerings and less about improved efficiency. Perhaps that is where the balance may lay.




January 15, 2007
In response to: Outside Inside Thinking – Blog 1
Tonja Broadwell commented:

Steve--it has been my observation in our midwestern industrial distribution company that although we have made various attempts to bring technology to our customers, they either weren't ready for what we had or found it easier to use traditional methods of getting what they needed. We were often frustrated by this, but felt we had to keep trying regardless...thinking sooner or later the time would be right and that we were better off being ready than trying to catch up.





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


Advertisement


Advertisements



About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription   |   RSS
© 2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites