Strictly For Sales: Two Types Of Push-Back On Price

Are price shoppers cynical, savvy, or both? Is there a difference between frugal and cheap? Are price shoppers solely responsible for the tug-of-war with salespeople? These are a few of the questions people like me ponder. Salespeople face daily push-back on their prices.

This article first appeared in Industrial Distribution's May/June 2013 Issue. To view it in it's original format, please click here.

Oscar Wilde once wrote, “A cynic is someone who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.”

Are price shoppers cynical, savvy, or both? Is there a difference between frugal and cheap? Are price shoppers solely responsible for the tug-of-war with salespeople? These are a few of the questions people like me ponder.

Salespeople face daily push-back on their prices. Helping salespeople deal with this reality is one reason I am in this business. But, not all price objections are created equally. There are two types of push-back on price: strategic price resistance and tactical price objections.

Strategic price resistance is a marketing challenge. Marketing operates strategically while sales executes tactically. Strategic price resistance has more to do with the type of business that you are pursuing and your pricing model. If you get push-back in the form of an RFP (RFQ), bid, or online reverse auctions, this is more procedural price resistance. Are you pursuing the right business? Is this the size, segment, or type of customer that you want? Does your value proposition allow you to make money on this type of business? You may be chasing the wrong stuff. The right question to ask at this point is, “Do we really want to invest any of our resources in this type of business?” If the answer is yes, make sure your value proposition reflects this type of business. If you try to sell a value-added solution to a price-only shopper, it is very much like trying to “teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig.” You cannot fix a strategic mistake with a tactical solution.

Peter Drucker said “the mark of a good manager is knowing which projects to work on; the mark of a great manager is knowing which projects not to work on.” This power of discernment applies to sales and marketing management: The mark of a good marketer is knowing which business to pursue, but the mark of a great marketer is knowing which business to avoid. When salespeople encounter too much strategic price resistance, management needs to re-evaluate their marketing strategy.

Tactical price objections come from customers with whom you want to work. You have already decided that you like their business and want more of it. Their needs and your solution run parallel. This resistance generally shows up in statements like:

• “That’s more than I wanted to pay.”
• “I don’t have the budget for this.”
• “I can buy this cheaper down the street or on the Internet.”
• “I just don’t see your value.”
• “I never pay retail for anything.”

These objections are more one-to-one. Typically, they represent a communications breakdown, a failure to qualify the buyer, or an attitude that reflects stubbornness of the buyer. They are not strategic objections because you really do want this business; it is good business for your company. Your challenge is to figure out a way to respond effectively. Salespeople generally find these objections easier to deal with because they do not cause you to question your reason for being there. You are fishing in the right pond. With strategic resistance, that is not always the case. Tactical price objections are resolved by guiding the conversation down the path of value.

Strategic price resistance may have a lot more to do with your pricing strategy for the market you are pursuing. Pricing is a strategic discipline and must be determined at that level. It takes into account total cost, market conditions, the impact of the solution on the customer, and profit objectives. Salespeople are handed the price and challenged to defend it at the tactical level. The more that your buyers know about your pricing model and logic, the more they have to pick apart. This is called value-stripping. This is why salespeople must keep the conversation tactical, not strategic. Salespeople should not have pricing authority because most will either offer a cheaper price to secure the business or respond to the push-back with a concession. Our research proves this reality.

All business is not good business for everyone. There is some business that you want the competition to take — some of that low-margin, high-aggravation, slow-pay, no-pay business. Then, when they get the business, take Napoleon’s advice: “Never interrupt an enemy when he is making a mistake.”

Tom Reilly is a professional speaker and author of Crush Price Objections (McGraw-Hill, 2010). You may contact him through his website www.TomReillyTraining.com.

More in Sales