Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Zibb
Subscribe to Industrial Distribution
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

The demise of the disintermediation myth

Jack Keough, Editor/Associate Publisher -- Industrial Distribution, 5/1/2007

It seems like just yesterday the word “disintermediation” was flying around the distribution world. Every industry seminar seemed to focus on the term, and countless articles were written about it.

I recall one purchasing executive telling me after such a seminar that there would be no need for industrial distributors in the future—that they would, indeed, be disintermediated from the purchasing process.

“We'll be buying products directly over the Internet,” he told me.

Other industry executives said outside sales positions would be eliminated because of the Web. But that hasn't happened, either. Distributors today are looking to add outside salespeople.

We've heard doom and gloom before. Remember “captive distribution?” Some manufacturers thought it would be easier to buy a distributor to service their plants than to deal with independent companies. It didn't work out very well, did it?

And then there were those that predicted the demise of distribution when buying groups entered the industry. At one meeting, throngs of distributors filled a room for a panel discussion about the first buying group in the business.

“Distribution will never be the same if this is allowed to happen,” said one panelist.

Meanwhile, buying groups had existed in the medical supply industry for years.

I couldn't help but recall these pieces of the past as we conducted interviews with some of our Big 50 executives, the results of which will be featured in next month's issue. Over and over, we heard about strong growth in 2006 and predictions of a good 2007. These executives told us they were increasing sales domestically and internationally, and that the Internet is not the threat it once seemed, but a tool that has helped increase sales.

There is no distribution system in the world as efficient as what exists in North America. Distributors, for the most part, are better capitalized than ever before and the future has never been brighter. They've adapted to the Internet, are selling services instead of giving them away, have become more technically astute, and are working closer with their customers.

As Mark Twain once said, “The report of my death was an exaggeration.” So is any report of the death of distribution.

jkeough@reedbusiness.com

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Sponsored Links

 
Advertisement

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Webcasts

Blogs

  • Nancye Combs
    Nancye M. Combs: Guest blogger

    April 28, 2008
    Handling employee ultimatums
    Q. A skilled electrician, who has been with us for eight years, had a non-work injury and was absent for six weeks. We are a very small company of ......
    More
  • Nancye Combs
    Nancye M. Combs: Guest blogger

    March 26, 2008
    Weapons in the workplace
    Q: Our company’s janitor told me that he was sweeping up the locker room when Tony, a 15-year local driver, opened his locker to get his jack......
    More
  • View All BlogsRSS
Advertisements





eUPDATES
Click on a title below to learn more.

Resource Center E-Alert
ID Channel Report (Twice-Monthly)
Strictly For Sales (Monthly)
Distributor Management and Operations (Monthly)
ID Channel Report News Alert (As News Breaks)
The Electrical Report (Monthly)
Idea File (Weekly)
Supplier Web Locator (Quarterly)
About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription   |   RSS
© 2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites