Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Zibb
Subscribe to Industrial Distribution
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

The wrong prescription for health costs

Jack Keough -- Industrial Distribution, 3/1/2003

If you were to ask an employer to list his major concerns, undoubtedly health insurance would be one of the first items mentioned. Health insurance premiums aren't just rising: they're soaring. And there's no end in sight. In fact, some manufacturers have told us recently that they aren't hiring because of the costs of health insurance.

So it was surprising to see that Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) will push for a bill in Congress requiring employers to provide their workers with mandated health insurance. Kennedy's plan would require most employers — those with five employees or more — to underwrite at least 75 percent of a health insurance package.

"For decades, we have required employers to contribute to Social Security and Medicare. We require them to pay a minimum wage and contribute to unemployment insurance. Now it is time to say that they also have an obligation to contribute to the cost of health insurance for their workers," Kennedy said in outlining his proposal at the National Press Club in Washington.

Most distributors have some sort of health insurance package for their employees. The majority of them probably pay less than 75 percent of their health insurance package, which is pretty high. In today's tough economic climate, employers, ironically, are requiring their employees to pay a higher percentage of their health insurance premiums.

Kennedy does raise a good point about employers. What is their "obligation"? Frankly, to me it appears that their obligation really is to provide a job. Sure it makes good business sense to provide benefits such as health insurance, pensions and the like to attract and keep employees. But in this economic environment, with hundreds of thousands of people out of work, does it make sense to put another burden on employers who are, in many cases, trying to keep their heads above water and hope that this recession will soon end so they can add to their payrolls?

No one can argue that there are too many people in this country without health insurance. But putting the burden on employers is the wrong medicine to solve the health insurance problem and could lead to further layoffs. That's in no one's best interests.

Jack Keough Editor/Aassociate Publisher jkeough@reedbusiness.com

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links

 
Advertisement

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Webcasts

Blogs

  • Jack Keough
    Keough's Korner

    July 21, 2008
    Wolseley’s stock continues to get hammered
    The news keeps getting worse for Wolseley, the British plumbing, heating and building supplies company, as the housing downturn caused its stock to......
    More
  • Nancye Combs
    Nancye M. Combs: Guest blogger

    April 28, 2008
    Handling employee ultimatums
    Q. A skilled electrician, who has been with us for eight years, had a non-work injury and was absent for six weeks. We are a very small company of ......
    More
  • View All BlogsRSS
Advertisements





eUPDATES
Click on a title below to learn more.

Resource Center E-Alert
ID Channel Report (Twice-Monthly)
Strictly For Sales (Monthly)
Distributor Management and Operations (Monthly)
ID Channel Report News Alert (As News Breaks)
The Electrical Report (Monthly)
Idea File (Weekly)
Supplier Web Locator (Quarterly)
About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription   |   RSS
© 2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites